Search This Blog

Monday, August 18, 2014

The Ferguson, Missouri's Media Non Sequitur-Fest





Webster defines a non sequitur as” a statement that is not connected in a logical or clear way to anything said before it”.  Witness just about any statement coming out of Ferguson, Missouri over the past week.

A young black man, Michael Brown, was shot and killed by a Ferguson, MO police officer on August 9.  Angry black mob leaders have been rushing to the nearest cameras and microphones to declare this a cold-blooded execution, premeditated criminal act, murder, and any other vile act they can pile on.

Certainly an investigation is in order, but the prevailing mob mentality is to forgo this formality and hang the white officer (and most of the rest of the Ferguson police force) from a flag pole in the town square.  It’s amazing to witness the media frenzy in action.  They hope for violence and chaos, which is really good for ratings.  They sprinkle in ‘experts’ for commentary, as if they can somehow rationalize the looting of local minimarts as class warfare or the racial frustrations of otherwise really good citizens that are representative of the US populace.   

Today’s show included press conferences from a medical examiner who conducted an independent autopsy of Michael Brown and concluded (spoiler alert) – Michael Brown died of a gunshot wound to the head.

Well that clinches it!!  Now we have proof that he was executed in cold blood by a racist, power-abusing, neo-Nazi storm trooper who hates black people and children!   Oh, wait, we already knew that Michel Brown was killed by a bullet.  And we already knew who pulled the trigger.  So what, exactly did this autopsy reveal?  The only thing I can see is that of the 6 wounds, some were caused by the same bullet reentering multiple times.  And yet, the headlines of all the media websites flash that “Independent Autopsy reveals that Michael Brown was shot at least 6 times”.  No, actually the examiner said there were multiple wounds caused by the same bullet, and that the fatal bullet entered in the top of his head. Lost in all the loaded questions was one that asked if any of the findings were inconsistent with the explanation of self-defense by the police officer. (Thanks for pouring cold water on that flaming press conference, pal!) Declaring “the victim was shot at least 6 times” has more of the wink-and-a-nudge flavor of excess that we need to keep this thing going.  Maybe this is enough to get something burned down or blown up tonight!  The networks can only hope.

The press conference was championed by a phalanx of  black attorneys and ‘anger translators’ who promptly concluded that this was conclusive proof that Michael Brown was executed in cold blood, completely innocent, and the officer involved should immediately be arrested.  Enter the blizzard of ‘Non Sequiturs.  CNN followed the press conference with a panel discussion of ‘experts’.  A well dressed, well-spoken black woman was re-offered the softball setup question that came out during the autopsy conference “Do we have enough evidence to make an arrest”?

“OF COURSE WE HAVE ENOUGH EVIDENCE!! She snorted indignantly.  “WE HAD ENOUGH EVIDENCE ON DAY ONE!  WHEN SOMEONE GETS SHOT, WE MAKE AN ARREST AND HOLD THOSE PEOPLE ACCOUNTABLE. THAT’S HOW OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM WORKS IN THIS COUNTRY!!”

A surprisingly calm medical examiner corrected her and pointed out that this is actually not how things work, police are not arrested for discharging the weapons they are obligated to carry.  We have investigations, we gather facts, and then we make determinations.  

BUT WE HAVE AN INDEPENDENT AUTOPSY FOR HEAVEN’S SAKE!! Any day now, we will get DNA EVIDENCE that PROVES, BEYOND ALL DOUBT, that the person who was shot was Michael Brown.  That should slam the door for good!!!  Perhaps if we pile up enough non sequiturs we get a relevant fact?  Wishful thinking. 

This is sad evidence of a public that has grown fat on a diet of TV Crime investigation shows.  CSI, NCIS, The Closer, Rizzoli and Isles, Forensic Files…  not that those shows aren’t entertaining, but the common climax of all shows is the clang of the steel-trap of scientific evidence slamming shut on the guilty and eliminating off all possible alternatives.  In a Hollywood script, that satisfying closure can be created for the ending viewers crave.  In the real world, medical examiners and lab results don’t always tell us what happened, and we need to follow well established procedures that include a presumption of innocence. If the mob and the mob leaders believe that law enforcement AND the criminal justice system are both corrupt and cannot be trusted, then they are really advocating revolution.  A responsible media would do some diligence to determine if corruption is really rampant and whether the appropriate corrective action has been taken. 

The script for the rest of this investigation is likely already set.  Any evidence that exonerates the shooting officer will be branded as contrived, falsified, and the police protecting their own.   Even the release of photos from the surveillance camera that showed Michael Brown apparently strong-arming another much smaller person is being met with angry accusations of character assassination.  

CNN also showed EXCLUSIVE EYEWITNESS CELLPHONE VIDEO (capital letters to convey breathless shouting, accompanied with heavy disclaimers of viewer discretion just to get our attention) that showed nothing other than Michel Brown lying in the street.  It showed absolutely nothing that we didn’t already know, but the media is trying fiercely to flame the passions to keep this in the spotlight as long as possible.  And it appears to be working, because now we are seeing camera time for figure heads like Al Sharpton, Malik Shabazz (national chairman of the New Black Panther Party and founder of Black Lawyers for Justice, just to distinguish them from all the white lawyers who don’t want justice), Trayvon Martin’s civil rights attorney Benjamin Crump, Martin Luther King III, and hoards of other civil rights wannabe’s.
The facts of the case in the tragic shooting of Michael Brown have become a minor detail; a footnote in ‘serving a larger purpose’.  

Google Tawana Brawley.  
Or the Duke Lacrosse team rape case.  

Conclusions are already being made, looting and violence are characterized as just passionate responses from victims of systematic oppression.  Any verdict short of emphatic guilt and public execution for a heinous act of racially motivated cruelty will not satisfy the bloodthirsty mob that the media has so irresponsibly whipped into their frenzy.  Little do they care that their incessant coverage will make impossible for Officer Darren Wilson to live a normal life, much less continue his career in law enforcement, should he be found guilty of doing nothing more than defending himself.  But hey, this way they can create another news frenzy any time he applies for a security job, gets a hunting license, has a fender bender (was it a black driver he hit???), or- god forbid- has any kind of domestic dispute with his family or neighbors.  

Convenient to create your own ratings makers. All you need is a faux naivete for your power to incite civil unrest, a callous disregard for destroying innocent lives, an an opportunistic greed that fuels an irresponsible mob mentality that refuses to accept the consequences of their own choices. In the infamous words of TV's J.R Ewing: "One you lose your integrity, the rest is easy". 

Thursday, May 1, 2014

Random Observations on the Los Angeles Clippers Donald Sterling Affair (and I use the term loosely)



As anyone who has not been living in a cave for the past week knows, an audio tape surfaced of the LA Clippers owner Donald Sterling talking to his girlfriend.  In the conversation, he asks her to stop publishing pictures of herself with black people.  This created a predictable media feeding frenzy in which everyone you have ever heard of weighs in on the profound effects on our civilization, sports, politics, and every other important matter you can think of.  Rather than offer another analysis on an already exhausted topic, I noted a few observations during the media orgy.


  • Does anyone else find it incredibly self-serving that Warriors Coach Mark Jackson called for fans to boycott the playoff game between his team and the LA Clippers the day AFTER they played in his arena?  Apparently a stand against racism is only significant during away games.

  • All this outrage, and not once did Donald Sterling drop the “N-bomb”.  

  • Nobody is nearly as 'outraged' that this guy shows up at games with his hooker girlfriend, gave a deposition detailing his sexual exploits with a different hooker girlfriend 10 years ago, and has been married for 50 years.  There was a time when that would have been distasteful enough to be forced out of an exclusive club.

  • A news report claims that LeBron James would have joined the LA Clippers last year if not for his distaste for owner Donald Sterling.  What does that say about the other Clippers to cash his paychecks every month?

  • Despite all the outrage, I didn’t see any LA Clippers players refuse to accept payment from a bigoted racist.  His money apparently spends as well as anyone’s.  In fact, it’s uncanny how all the calls for protest and boycott consistently come from people who demand that OTHER people make the statement. 

  • The NAACP was scheduled to give Donald Sterling a lifetime achievement award next month.  How much due diligence could they have done on the man?  Another way to ask:  What does it take to put one in the good graces of the NAACP?  Apparently money is far more influential than character.

  • The story is not that Donald Sterling is a racist but that he allowed his damaging rhetoric to be recorded and dangled to a frenzied media.  I’m guessing most of us said something in the past week that we wouldn’t want to be broadcast across the whole country.   What does this say about your exposure and your expectations of privacy?

  • Astute observers will recognize what giants can be felled by a few words, and they will plot to bring down opponents with similar strategies.  The one who can lead a mob with pitchforks and torches is powerful indeed.  But not necessarily just.  

  • NBA ownership is an exclusive club, and membership is contingent on agreeing to a set of rules, some of them subjective.  I can’t fault the commissioner for giving him a lifetime ban, as was his prerogative.  The owners needed to distance themselves from Sterling, and they cut him loose.  He deserved it.  But I’m not convinced that the angry mob makes the distinction between the bylaws of NBA ownership and the rights of a US citizen. They believe they can force anyone in power to give up anything they want, without regard to constitutional rights like free speech, prosperity, or conflicting – even offensive – viewpoints.  We will see how power-drunk they will become.






Monday, February 10, 2014

Michael Sam: Finally, A Gay Athlete We Can All Get Behind!



Note:  Although not vulgar, this post contains discussion of an adult topic. Reader discretion is advised.

At last, we finally have our first openly gay professional athlete!  Well, the first if you don’t count diver Greg Louganis, Jason Collins of the NBA, Orlando Cruz of the World Boxing Organization, US Women’s Soccer Player Megan Rapinoe, David Testo of Major League Soccer, Tennis Player Billie Jean King, and a good swath of the WNBA[1].  I’m sure I’m overlooking many other well-deserving icons. But never mind all that:  Michael Sam, All American defensive tackle of Missouri, has ‘come out’ and proclaimed his sexual preference.  Finally, we have a reason to watch football!

Sam was all over the mainstream media today, taking bows for his honest, courageous proclamation of how he likes his sex.  This is certainly a bold step forward for Americans.  

Again.  

Of course, it was 40 years ago that Billie Jean King ‘came out’. In fact, Elton John’s song “Philadelphia Freedom” was written about her back in 1975.  And several ex-NFL players have since declared themselves gay.  (If only they could crack into men’s gymnastics: That last holdout of old-school testosterone-drenched bigotry!)
Come to think of it, I’m not sure what actually is ‘news’ about an athlete’s sexual behavior, including the media’s insistence that we find it relevant.  But if this is important, I feel bad for all those athletes who are forced into the dichotomy of being gay or straight.  What if they prefer foursomes?  Or have a shoe fetish?  When will we hear from the first pro athlete who really loves his German Shepard (a consenting canine of appropriate age, of course)?  Or how about farm animals in general?   I don’t know about you, but I just can’t follow an athletic contest unless I know what stimulates their genitalia.  Same with news anchors, judges, doctors, singers… I mean how can you really appreciate anybody’s contribution to your entertainment or well-being unless you know what they do when they are naked? 

If these arguments seem ludacris, ask yourself why an athlete’s sexual preference should be mainstream news on CNN, CBS, ESPN or any other network.   Tim Tebow starts every interview by thanking God and proclaiming his faith, yet he is vilified by the sports media for being a failed athlete.  Can we expect the same ‘honest’ criticism if Michael Sam washes out of the NFL? Or is there a different standard if your belief system is based on sexuality?